The Pros & Cons of ‘Resurrecting’ Dead Stars With AI

HOME > LEVEL3

The Pros & Cons of ‘Resurrecting’ Dead Stars With AI

트로피이미지

0What’s This About?
The advancement of artificial intelligence has opened up new possibilities in the world of entertainment and beyond. One of the most controversial applications of AI is the digital resurrection of deceased celebrities, allowing them to perform or endorse products long after their death. While this technology offers exciting prospects, it raises the question of whether we should pursue such practices.

Constructive
Pro Finn
I believe that using AI to “resurrect” deceased stars offers exciting possibilities for entertainment and preserving cultural heritage. Imagine being able to experience a live concert by Elvis Presley or Whitney Houston or watch a new movie starring Marilyn Monroe. AI can bring these iconic figures to life for new generations, preserving their legacies and keeping their contributions to culture alive and relevant. AI recreations can also expand creative possibilities. We could see songs featuring collaborations between living artists and deceased ones or movies starring classic actors alongside modern stars. Furthermore, this application of AI could finally allow us to see unfinished works completed or abandoned projects revived. It would bring closure to fans and artists alike, providing emotional satisfaction and a sense of continuity after a sudden passing.

Con Alice
Bringing deceased stars back to life through AI raises several significant ethical and legal concerns. First and foremost, using someone’s likeness, voice, or persona without their explicit consent is a form of exploitation, especially as they are no longer alive to give it. This practice risks commodifying deceased performers, reducing them to mere entertainment products, and stripping away the humanity and individuality that made them unique. It could also lead to portrayals inconsistent with the deceased’s values and image, distorting their legacy and disrespecting their memory. And that’s not getting into the emotional impact such recreations would have on the deceased’s surviving family members, friends, and fans. Seeing a loved one digitally resurrected could be distressing, especially if the portrayal does not align with how they were in life.

Rebuttal
Pro Finn
I understand the concerns raised by Alice, but such issues are manageable with the right legal frameworks. For instance, using a deceased celebrity’s likeness should only be permitted if it is explicitly allowed by their estate or through pre-existing contracts. It would ensure that the practice is not exploitative and that any financial benefits go to the heirs of the deceased, charitable causes, or initiatives to preserve and promote the star’s legacy. Furthermore, as I mentioned before, by using AI to resurrect stars, we can explore new frontiers in storytelling, art, and performance, inspiring future creators to push the limits of their imagination. As long as we approach this with respect for the deceased, this practice can be a celebration of their enduring influence rather than a violation of their memory.

Con Alice
Allowing AI recreations could set a precedent that leads to increasingly questionable uses of AI. It might extend beyond entertainment into more invasive and potentially harmful applications, such as deepfakes or unauthorized use of private individuals’ images. Moreover, using AI to resurrect deceased stars could blur the lines between reality and fiction, leading to broader societal implications. Audiences might struggle to distinguish between genuine and AI-generated performances, leading to a loss of authenticity in media and entertainment. This erosion of authenticity could diminish the value of human creativity and performance and erode public trust in media content. Thus, relying on AI to recreate past stars could stifle innovation and creativity in the arts. Instead of celebrating and nurturing new talent, the industry would become overly focused on rehashing the past.

Judge’s Comments
That concludes today’s debate. As we move forward, it is crucial that we carefully consider the implications of this technology and ensure that we harness it in ways that honor and respect the legacies of those who have passed away.

Yesel Kang
Copy Editor
teen/1725582830/1613367727